The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden
| datum | 2021/04/08 |
|---|---|
| etiketter | sverige,peer-reviewed, vetenskaplig artikel,PLoS ONE |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/authors?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249732 |
| bild | 
|
| youtubeid |
Citation: Born B, Dietrich AM, Mu¨ller GJ (2021) The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden. PLoS ONE 16(4): e0249732. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0249732
Abstract
While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual
lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first,
that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by
about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a
delay of 3–4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was
less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not
have caused much additional output loss.